Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of B.A.H.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 9, 2014No. A12-1347PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
After a bench trial on stipulated evidence, the district court found respondent *161B.A.H. guilty of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and adjudicated him delinquent. B.A.H. appealed, arguing that the statute under which he was adjudicated delinquent, Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(g) (2012), is unconstitutional as applied to him. The court of appeals agreed and held that subdivision 1(g) violated B.A.H.’s rights to due process and equal protection. In re Welfare of B.A.H., 829 N.W.2d 431, 438 (Minn.App.2013). We granted the State’s petition for review. Because we…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Wilbur W., a juvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- In Re GUARDIANSHIP and CONSERVATORSHIP OF Helen Louise DURAND, Ward/Protected PersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. Colton M.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
- Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.