Legal Opinion

Rose v. Clark

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 2, 1986No. 84-1974PublishedCited by 2,239 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

This case presents the question whether the harmless-error standard of Chapman v. California, 386 U. S. 18 (1967), applies to jury instructions that violate the principles of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U. S. 510 (1979), and Francis v. Franklin, 471 U. S. 307 (1985).1

—

On December 30, 1978, Charles Browning and Joy Faulk were shot to death while they sat in Browning’s pickup truck in a remote area of Rutherford County, Tennessee. Respondent Stanley Clark, Faulk’s former boyfriend, was charged with the murders.

The evidence introduced at trial showed that Browning, Faulk, and Faulk’s two young…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,239 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

2,234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API