Legal Opinion

State v. Riley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 2003No. C4-02-1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Dane Riley was charged with illegal possession of a firearm and two counts of second-degree assault after drivers reported that their cars had been hit by gun shots on Highway 371, north of Pine River. At a contested omnibus hearing, Riley moved to suppress all evidence, including a rifle, obtained during a stop of the car in which he was a passenger. The district court denied the suppression motion. Riley and the state agreed to submit an amended second-degree assault charge to the court on stipulated facts under the procedure provided in State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. VohnoutkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KnollCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. MahrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State of Minnesota v. Shante Cheriece DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State of Minnesota v. Steven Duane SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. State v. BurdickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API