State v. Kebaso
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Chief Justice.
This case presents the issue of whether a court is permitted to consider the immigration consequences to a criminal defendant when deciding which of multiple sentences to vacate or which of multiple offenses to sentence on under Minn.Stat. § 609.035 (2004). The court of appeals concluded that such consequences may not be considered in the context of sentencing under section 609.035. State v. Kebaso (Kebaso II), No. A04-1239, 2005 WL 1153727, at *3 (MinnApp. May 17, 2005). We affirm, holding that immigration consequences to a criminal defendant are not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. BookwalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. FranksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State of Minnesota v. Gregory Allen OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.