Legal Opinion

State v. Kebaso

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 2006No. A04-1239PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Chief Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether a court is permitted to consider the immigration consequences to a criminal defendant when deciding which of multiple sentences to vacate or which of multiple offenses to sentence on under Minn.Stat. § 609.035 (2004). The court of appeals concluded that such consequences may not be considered in the context of sentencing under section 609.035. State v. Kebaso (Kebaso II), No. A04-1239, 2005 WL 1153727, at *3 (MinnApp. May 17, 2005). We affirm, holding that immigration consequences to a criminal defendant are not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. BookwalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. FranksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State of Minnesota v. Gregory Allen OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API