Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Reno
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 4, 1996No. Civil Action 95-1748 (CRR)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above-captioned case is the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ pleadings, the entire record herein, and the applicable law with respect thereto, the Court will grant the defendants’ Motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, currently incarcerated at the Sandstone Federal Correctional Institution at Sandstone, Minnesota, brings this action pro se and in forma pauperis, alleging that the defendants acted in concert and under the color of state law to deprive him of his “civil and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Freeman v. FallinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Epps v. U.S. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Banks v. YorkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Ballard v. HolinkaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Dye v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.