Legal Opinion

Epps v. U.S. Attorney General

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 8, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1188 (RMC)PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Larry D. Epps complains that a Community Supervision Officer (“C SO”) erroneously reported that he had used drugs, when his positive drug test resulted from prescription medications, causing him to be incarcerated for sixty days to await a revocation hearing by the United States Parole Commission (“Parole Commission”), after which he was re-paroled. As a result, his newly-established home repair business collapsed. He seeks compensatory and punitive damages from the following Federal Defendants: United States Attorney General, the Parole…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Bickford v. Government of the United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Ballard v. HolinkaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Gonzalez v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Richardson v. YellenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Johnson v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API