Legal Opinion
Ballard v. Holinka
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 27, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1166 (RWR)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer. For the reasons stated below, the Court will dismiss some claims and transfer the remaining claims to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
I. BACKGROUND
At all times relevant to the complaint, plaintiff was incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Waseca, Minnesota (“FCI Waseca”) and defendant Carol Holinka (“Holinka”) was its Warden. 1
A. July 2006 Issue of American Curves
Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”)…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gomez v. AragonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Kurtz v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Morris v. United States Sentencing CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Atwal v. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Geronimo v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.