Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Fallin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2003No. Civil Action 02-0386 (RMU)PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Dependants’
Motion to Dismiss
I. INTRODUCTION
This Bivens 1 action comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (3), (4) and (6). The pro se plaintiffs, Stephen Freeman and Lorraine Fairchild (“the plaintiffs”), are former criminal investigators with the Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) of the United States Environmental Protection Agen cy (“EPA”). The defendants, who are sued in their individual capacities, are former OIG Assistant Inspector General for Investigations…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Williams v. GEICO CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McCain v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Douglas v. Chariots for HireDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Modaressi v. VedadiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Holmes-Martin v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.