Legal Opinion
Indergit v. Rite Aid Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 26, 2013No. 08 Civ. 9361 (JPO)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Yatram Indergit, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, asserts claims against Rite Aid corporation, Rite Aid of New York, Inc., and Frank Offer (together, “RA”), alleging that RA failed to compensate its store managers (“SMs”) for overtime hours, in violation of both the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA”), and the New York Labor Law §§ 650 et seq. (“NYLL”). Prior to discovery, in June 2010, Judge Paul G. Gardephe conditionally certified the FLSA class of RA store managers, granting Indergit’s…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Callari ex rel. Blackman Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Blackman Plumbing Supply, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Indergit v. Rite Aid Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Houser v. PritzkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Ramirez v. Riverbay Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.