Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. Riverbay Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 1, 2014No. 13 Civ. 2367(JGK)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The plaintiffs bring this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), §§ 190 et seq. & 650 et seq., claiming various violations of their right to receive a minimum wage and overtime compensation. The plaintiffs are current and former hourly' employees of RiverBay Corp. (“RiverBay”). On December 20, 20Í3, the Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification of a collective action pursuant to Section 216(b) of the FLSA. The plaintiffs now move for certification…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Shahriar v. Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Vincent v. Money StoreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Garcia v. E.J. Amusements of New Hampshire, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Jensen v. Cablevision Sys. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Rivera v. Harvest Bakery Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.