Legal Opinion
Houser v. Pritzker
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 2, 2014No. 10cv3105-FMPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this putative class action, Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, allege that the process by which the United States Census Bureau (“Census Bureau”) screens applicants for temporary jobs- for the Decennial Census is racially discriminatory and therefore violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). Specifically, the Plaintiffs challenge (a) the Census Bureau’s policy requiring all applicants with criminal records to provide “official court…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mandala v. NTT Data, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- United States ex rel. Ortiz v. Mount Sinai HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.