Draper v. Astoria School District No. 1C
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
Magistrate Stewart filed her Findings and Recommendation on January 15, 1998. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir.1983); see also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.1983) Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. •
Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Stewart’s Findings and Recommendation that…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Arnold v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Neighorn v. Quest Health CareDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Lindsey v. Clatskanie People's Utility DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Huitt v. Optum Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Whitley v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.