Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. Clatskanie People's Utility District
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 23, 2015No. Case No. 3:14-cv-485-SIPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Michael H. Simon, District Judge.
Plaintiff Raymond Lindsey (“Lindsey”) has sued his former employer, Defendant Clatskanie People’s Utility District (“CPUD”), for religious discrimination in violation of federal and state civil rights laws, retaliation in violation of federal and state civil rights laws, whistleblower relation in violation of state whistleblower laws, and wrongful discharge under state common law. Lindsey concedes CPUD’s motion for summary judgment on his religious discrimination claims. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies CPUD’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Burley v. Clackamas Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Daniel v. Oregon Health & Sciences UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Becker v. Hood River County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Castellanos v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the NorthwestDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.