Legal Opinion
Whitley v. City of Portland
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 12, 2009No. Civil 07-1114-ACPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta filed his Findings and Recommendation (# 171) on May 20, 2009. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct. 1277, 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
Plaintif…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shepard v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Tornabene v. Northwest Permanente, P.C.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Hunt v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Rinallo v. CAPSA Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Amadi v. Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.