Legal Opinion

Huitt v. Optum Health Services

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 1, 2016No. 3:14-CV-01064-BRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ANNA J. BROWN, United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion (# 87) for Summary Judgment of Defendant Optum Health Services.1 For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.

BACKGROUND

The following facts are taken from the parties’ summary-judgment materials and are undisputed unless otherwise noted.

Defendant employed Plaintiff Susan Huitt as a WorkLife Resource & Referral Consultant (RRC) from October 2005 through April 2014. RRCs are “responsible for providing [United Health Group] UHG2 members who call into the Employee…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Becker v. Hood River County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  2. Brent Jason v. Adobe, Inc. and Does 1-10District Court, D. Oregon · 2026
  3. Castellanos v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the NorthwestDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  4. Fischer v. Multnomah County - Department of Community JusticeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  5. Grilho v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API