Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 9, 2013No. Civ. No. 3:10-cv-1025-ACPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN V. ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge. :
Introduction
Plaintiff Kimberly Arnold (“Arnold”) brings this employment lawsuit against defendant Pfizer, Inc. (“Pfizer”) arising from a prior employment relationship. Arnold alleges claims of discrimination and retaliation under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“the ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; discrimination and retaliation under the Oregon Rehabilitation Act, Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) 659A.100 et seq.; retaliation for filing a workers compensation claim, in violation of ORS 659A.040; violation of…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lindsey v. Clatskanie People's Utility DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Tornabene v. Northwest Permanente, P.C.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Anderson v. Hibu, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. AnttiDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Davis v. Con-Way Freight Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.