Legal Opinion
Neighorn v. Quest Health Care
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 2, 2012No. Case No. 1:10-cv-03105-CLPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CLARKE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion (# 40) for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, *1075the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff John Neighorn (“Neighorn”) filed this action on September 30, 2011, against defendants Quest Health Care (“Quest”) and Rotech Healthcare, Inc. (“Rotech”) (collectively, “Rotech”)1 alleging claims for retaliatory discharge in violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq., and Oregon’s whistleblower statute ORS § 659A.199; violation of ORS §…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lindsey v. Clatskanie People's Utility DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Huitt v. Optum Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Larmanger v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- United States ex rel. Witkin v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.