Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 2008No. H030063PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

Pamela W. Clark appeals from a default judgment and an order denying relief from that judgment unless she posts bond in an amount to secure payment of some $300,000 in compensatory damages plus $1.5 million in punitive damages. She contends that the trial court should have granted relief without conditions. Respondents Mark D. Shapiro and GoGuys, Inc. (collectively, Shapiro), contend that the motion for relief should have been denied outright, and that the conditions are proper. We hold that given appellant’s compelling showing of good cause for the minimal neglect…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sakaguchi v. SakaguchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Hopkins & Carley v. GensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Grappo v. McMillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. County of Los Angeles v. GLENDORA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Shapiro v. Clark (In Re Clark)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API