Legal Opinion

Rappleyea v. Campbell

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1994No. S035028PublishedCited by 186 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

—The question is whether a default must be set aside and a default judgment reversed on the ground of abuse of discretion. We conclude that they must be, and reverse the Court of Appeal’s judgment.

Defendants, Arizona residents, were personally served with a summons and complaint on November 1, 1990. Defendants chose to proceed in propria persona and had an Arizona lawyer, apparently an old friend of theirs, telephone the Los Angeles Superior Court for information on filing procedures. The clerk’s office told the lawyer’s staff that the filing fee was $89, according to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by186 opinions

  1. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Hoover v. American Income Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API