Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Connolly

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1979No. L.A. 31029PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

This case involves a contested marital dissolution proceeding in which, after trial, corporate stock conceded to be community property was awarded to husband, a director of the corporation. The issue presented is whether husband had a fiduciary obligation to inform wife of facts which might affect the stock’s value even though such information was readily ascertainable by wife or her counsel upon reasonable inquiry. We conclude that under the circumstances of this case husband had no such duty.

Wife and husband were married April 16, 1961, in Los Angeles and they have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. PietakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API