County of Los Angeles v. GLENDORA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McADAMS, J.
This appeal concerns the validity of appellants’ redevelopment plan, adopted by ordinance in July 2006. The trial court invalidated the ordinance, concluding that the necessary findings of blight were not supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record. Having independently reviewed the record, we reach the same conclusion. We shall therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
The appellants are the City of Glendora, the City Council of the City of Glendora, and the Glendora Redevelopment Agency (collectively, Glendora). The respondent here is the County of Los Angeles (the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Professional Engineers v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- County of San Bernardino v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re MorgantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Newhall School Dist. v. Acton-Agua Unified School Dist. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015