Grappo v. McMills
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, Acting P. J.
—Representing himself, appellant Donald T. Grappo filed a complaint purporting to allege 10 causes of action. Seven of the causes of action were set forth in one paragraph, the other three ranging from two paragraphs to five—a complaint, we note, that as framed could not have withstood a demurrer. Grappo had the complaint served on Kenneth McKean, a man named in the caption but not identified in the complaint— and who from all indications had no relationship with Grappo. Six months after such service—and without warning to anyone—Grappo filed a request for default…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McClain v. Kissler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Sass v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Contractors' State License Bd. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ammari v. AmmariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Chandler v. Dayton CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.