Legal Opinion

Cassim v. Allstate Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2004No. S109711PublishedCited by 220 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In this case involving an insurance company’s bad faith, the insureds’ counsel engaged in a line of reasoning during closing argument to which the insurer’s counsel objected. The trial court overruled the objection, and a verdict for the insureds resulted. A divided Court of Appeal reversed the judgment, finding the closing argument was prejudicial error. We consider on review whether the insureds’ counsel committed misconduct in closing argument and, if so, whether the misconduct was prejudicial. In resolving these issues, we necessarily address the proper standard of…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by220 opinions

  1. People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014

215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API