Legal Opinion

North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2004No. CV-03-0279-PRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Arizona’s arbitration act, Aiz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) §§ 12-1501 to -1518 (2003), provides that the act has “no application to arbitration agreements between employers and employees or their respective representatives.” A.R.S. § 12-1517. We granted review to determine whether Arizona Revised Statutes section 12-1517 applies to all arbitration agreements between employers and employees or only those found in collective bargaining contracts. We hold that § 12-1517 exempts from the Arizona Uniform Arbitration Act (“Act”) all arbitration agreements between employers and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. In Re Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Orca Communications v. Ann Noder Et vir/pitch PublicArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  5. William Roubos v. Hon. Leslie miller/tucsonArizona Supreme Court · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API