Legal Opinion

In Re Van Dusen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 2011No. 10-73780PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

654 F.3d 838 (2011)

In re Virginia VAN DUSEN; John Doe; Joseph Sheer.

Virginia Van Dusen; Joseph Sheer; John Doe, Petitioners,

v.

United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Phoenix, Respondent,

Swift Transportation Co. Inc. Interstate Equipment; Interstate Equipment Leasing, Incorporated; Chad Killebrew; Jerry Moyes, Real Parties in Interest.

No. 10-73780.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 9, 2011.

Filed July 27, 2011.

Susan Martin, Martin & Bonnett, Phoenix, AZ, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Ronald Holland, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, San…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Boon Global Limited v. Usdc-CaoakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Bozic v. U.S. Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Cal.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. Usdc-CasfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API