William Roubos v. Hon. Leslie miller/tucson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether a party that prevails in a civil infraction proceeding brought by a city may recover attorneys’ fees under Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 12-348 (2003). We hold that it may.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In 2004, the City of Tucson twice cited Defendants William Roubos, Derrick De-Nomme, and KTTL Enterprises-Pacific Beach Club, Inc., for violating Tucson City Code (“TCC”) § 16-32 by allowing unruly gatherings at the DV8 Nightclub. Defendants were found not responsible after a civil infraction…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. SantanaArizona Supreme Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- In Re the Marriage of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. WaldrenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re the Marriage of KassaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.