Legal Opinion

William Roubos v. Hon. Leslie miller/tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2007No. CV-06-0181-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether a party that prevails in a civil infraction proceeding brought by a city may recover attorneys’ fees under Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 12-348 (2003). We hold that it may.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In 2004, the City of Tucson twice cited Defendants William Roubos, Derrick De-Nomme, and KTTL Enterprises-Pacific Beach Club, Inc., for violating Tucson City Code (“TCC”) § 16-32 by allowing unruly gatherings at the DV8 Nightclub. Defendants were found not responsible after a civil infraction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. SantanaArizona Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. In Re the Marriage of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. WaldrenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. In Re the Marriage of KassaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API