Legal Opinion

Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 21, 2001No. 99-1379PublishedCited by 1,277 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA or Act) excludes from the Act’s coverage “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.” 9 U. S. C. § 1. All but one of the Courts of Appeals which have addressed the issue interpret this provision as exempting contracts of employment of transportation workers, but not other employment contracts, from the FAA’s coverage. A different interpretation has been adopted by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which construes the exemption so that all contracts of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,277 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Ali v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

1,272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API