Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Losey
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1947No. Civ. 15368PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.
One of. the plaintiffs is a real estate broker. His wife is a party plaintiff because she is the purchaser named in an agreement of purchase, and sale of real property which was enforced by judgment of trial court. Temple City is in Los Angeles County, a short.distance east of the city of Los Angeles, and is growing very rapidly. Contemplating establishing a real estate office in Temple City, plaintiff looked over the business part of the area in which he wished to locate his office; centered on one particular spot, and then searched the records of Los Angeles County to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Feckenscher v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Abbott v. the 76 Land and Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Baird v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Coleman v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Jolton v. Minster Graf & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Cecka v. Beckman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Christensen v. SlawterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Skone v. Quanco FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.