Abbott v. the 76 Land and Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, in an action brought to recover $134,-145 with interest.
The second amended complaint stated four alleged causes of action, all of which have been assigned to this plaintiff by the original owners. The first is a sample of all. One 0. L. Abbott was, on October 1, 1887, the equitable owner of 320 acres of land, and of “320 inches of water, miner’s measurement, incident thereto, constant and permanent flow from the canal of defendant.” Defendant held the legal title as trustee…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Commerce Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. BlyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Abbott v. '76 Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Bracken v. . Atlantic Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Head v. MeloneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.