Legal Opinion

Jolton v. Minster Graf & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1942No. Civ. 13395PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment in an action for damages for breach of duty and fraudulent conduct in failing diligently and .faithfully to represent plaintiff as his agents in the matter of the sale of property which defendants had been engaged to sell for plaintiff.

The basis of the judgment, as established by the findings, was that defendants actually found a purchaser and made a sale of the property for the owner but intentionally delayed consuminating the sale until an option which plaintiff held to purchase the property had expired, as a result of which conduct plaintiff suffered a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McPhetridge v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Gammon v. Ealey & ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Orfanos v. California Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Holland Realty Investment Co. v. State, Department of CommerceNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Fisher v. LoseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Mitchell v. LocurtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API