Legal Opinion

Baird v. Madsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1943No. Civ. 12235PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover $2,925 as real estate commissions and $750 attorney’s fees alleged to be due under a sales agency agreement dated June 20, 1939. The cause went to trial on the third amended complaint, and was tried before the court sitting without a jury. Several days after the cause was submitted for decision plaintiff moved for leave to file a fourth amended complaint where-under he based his claim to commissions on a later agreement, dated July 26, 1939, which covered a greater quantity of land and called for the payment of a larger commission. The ground of the motion was that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Kansas City Exposition Driving Park v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Carter v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  4. Mitchell v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Whitelock v. BeachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Roberts v. LomantoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Love v. GulyasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Landis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API