Legal Opinion

Skone v. Quanco Farms

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1968No. Civ. 871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.

Respondent, a dealer in potatoes, brought this action against appellant Quanco Farms to restrain appellant from interfering with the harvesting of a potato crop. Quanco Farms is a corporation engaged in the business of farming. It is owned and controlled by Carl Quandt and H. F. Beckerdite. By stipulation of the parties the injunction issues were dropped and the harvest was allowed to proceed. Appellant then cross-complained, seeking damages against respondent for the alleged breach of their joint-venture agreement. The cause proceeded to trial on the issues raised by the cross-complaint, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Greenspan v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (In Re Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2009
  4. Wirum & Cash, Architects v. CashAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Salyer Grain & Milling Co. v. HensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API