Legal Opinion
Matter of Linehan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 12, 1996No. C3-96-511PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
This case raises questions regarding the scope of the review hearing for final commitments under the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 253B.02, subd.' 18b, 253B.18, subds. 2-3, 253B.185, subd. 1 (1994) (SDP Act), and the sufficiency of the evidence supporting appellant Dennis Darol Li-nehan’s final and indeterminate commitment. Linehan challenges the district court’s final order of commitment following a statutorily required 60-day review hearing in which the court determined that Linehan continues to qualify for commitment under the SDP Act. He…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re LinehanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Twin Cities Metropolitan Public Transit Area v. HolterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- City of St. Paul v. LaClairSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Hince v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Dennis D. Linehan v. Frank R. Milczark, Sued as Frank MilczarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- In re the Civil Commitment of NavratilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re the Civil Commitment of RannowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.