In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
Appellant challenges his indeterminate civil commitment as an SDP, arguing that the district court erred in concluding that he is an SDP and in indeterminately committing him when the treatment facility did not treat him during his initial commitment period. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Ryan Navratil was born in April 1981, and his biological parents divorced shortly thereafter. His father remarried when Navratil was approximately five years old. Shortly before the marriage, one of Navratil’s stepbrothers committed suicide by hanging himself in the family home; Navratil…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Matter of LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Matter of KnopsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Linehan v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Civil Commitment of MoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF Gary George SPICERCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake SwopeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake SwopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.