Legal Opinion

Twin Cities Metropolitan Public Transit Area v. Holter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1977No. 46608PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

2Per curiam

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of part of Minn. St. 473.413, subd. 6. Defendant contends the entire subdivision should be declared unconstitutional. We dismiss the appeal.

Plaintiff, Twin Cities Metropolitan Public Transit Area, is. a public corporation and political subdivision of the state, which acts by and through its governing body, the Twin Cities Area Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC). It owns and operates a public transit system which serves more than 50 percent of the persons using…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Singer v. Allied Factors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Regents of University v. Cannon Valley Girl Scouts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. In Re Trust Pursuant to Decree in Estate of EverettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. ColschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Minnesota Medical Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Richards v. ReiterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In Re Village of ByronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API