Legal Opinion
In Re Linehan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 19, 1996No. C1-95-2022PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
On appeal from a judgment of commitment as a sexually dangerous person, Dennis D. Linehan argues: (1) the proof fell short, as a matter of law, of the statutory elements; and (2) the sexually dangerous persons statute is unconstitutional.
FACTS
While on parole from a state training school on July 25, 1956, Linehan took indecent liberties with a four-year-old girl. In February 1960, at the age of 19, Linehan engaged in sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl. In July 1963, Linehan beat and repeatedly raped L.H. In June 1965, *311Linehan engaged in window peeping, spotted a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Matter of LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Dennis D. Linehan v. Frank R. Milczark, Sued as Frank MilczarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- In Re the Civil Commitment of MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Matter of LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.