Legal Opinion

In Re the Civil Commitment of Rannow

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 2008No. A07-2246PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant Steven Leo Rannow challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to rescind its order committing appellant to the Minnesota Security Hospital for treatment as mentally ill and dangerous pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 253B.18 (2006). The district court issued its order following appellant’s stipulation that he is “mentally ill and dangerous,” as defined by Minn-Stat. § 253B.02, subd. 17 (2006). Appellant contends that the district court should not have accepted his stipulation because the record lacks a sufficient factual basis to support a finding of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. State v. GouletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. In Re LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Application of Anthony Allen Jessie Garnett for a Change of NameCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
  2. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett UrbanekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API