Legal Opinion
City of St. Paul v. LaClair
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 1992No. CX-90-1741PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Chief Justice.
The City of Saint Paul (“City”) seeks further review of a court of appeals decision which affirmed the City of St. Paul Civil Service Commission’s (“Commission”) rescission of the suspension of police officer Catherine LaClair. The court of appeals held that the City was not entitled to a due process hearing. City of St. Paul v. LaClair, 466 N.W.2d 5 (Minn.App.1991). Because we conclude that the City lacks standing to appeal, we dismiss the appeal.
The underlying facts of this case are as follows. At 12:59 a.m. on January 22, 1990, a police call went out that there had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sellin v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Minnesota State Board of Health v. Governor's Certificate of Need Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- City of St. Paul v. LaClairCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richards v. ReiterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Matter of LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Webster v. Hennepin Cnty.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Matter of LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996