Legal Opinion
Dodgens v. Kent Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 20, 1997No. CA 8:95-2180-20AKPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HERLONG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 19.02 DSC. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility for making a final determination remains with the United States District Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 96 S.Ct. 549, 46 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Oswalt v. Sara Lee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Daniel R. Arban, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. West Publishing Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Hunt v. Rapides Healthcare System, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Eady v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
- Smith v. DataCard Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Knussman v. State of Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.