Legal Opinion
Smith v. DataCard Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 24, 1998No. CIV. 3-96-1015PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Based on the record and the arguments of the parties, the Court determines that Defendants’ motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Cereatha Smith is an Ajfriean-American woman who worked as an evening janitor for Defendant DataCard Corporation (“DataCard”) from June 22, 1992, until her termination on June 12,1996. DataCard is a security company that is incorporated in Delaware and…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Douglas v. Victor Capital GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Bahr v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Scheidecker v. Arvig Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.