Alberts v. . Alberts
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
Is service of summons valid where service is obtained under the provision of N. C. Code, 1939 (Michie), sections 491 (a) and 491 (b) (Public Laws 1929, ch. 75), providing for service of process upon the Commissioner of Revenue as agent for nonresident motorists where the plaintiff and the defendant are nonresidents of North Carolina and are residents of the same state and are husband and wife? ¥e think so.
The law applicable in reference to the controversy, N. C. Code, supra, section 469, in part, is as follows: “In all other cases the action must be tried in the county in which the plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Howard v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Shirley v. . AyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Ashley v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shaw v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Ewing v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Howle v. Twin States Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Jernigan v. JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Henry v. HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.