Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Thompson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 9, 1951No. 528PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinbokNe, J.

The statute, G.S. 1-105, under which plaintiff has attempted to bring the defendants/residents of Canada, into court in this action, provides in pertinent part that “The acceptance by a non-resident of the rights and privileges conferred by law now or hereafter in force in this State permitting the operation of motor vehicles, as evidenced by the operation of a motor vehicle by such non-resident on the public highways of this State . . . shall be deemed equivalent to the appointment by such non-resident of the Commissioner of Motor Yehicles, or of his successor in office, to be his true and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Ashley v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Pawloski v. HessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Robertson ex rel. King v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Clark v. . SweaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Sarah Etta Davis, Administratrix of the Estate of Earl Sinclair Davis, Deceased v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  3. Stansel v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Cox v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Goode v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API