Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Lee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1963No. 665PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

We have in previous decisions held claimant’s right to recover and the amount which may be recovered for personal injuries must be determined by the law of the state where the injuries were sustained; if no right of action exists there, the injured party has none which can be enforced elsewhere. Doss v. Sewell, 257 N.C. 404; Kizer v. Bowman, 256 N.C. 565, 124 S.E. 2d 543; Knight v. Associated Transport, Inc., 255 N.C. 462, 122 S.E. 2d 64; Nix v. English, 254 N.C. 414, 119 S.E. 2d 220; McCombs v. Trucking Co., 252 N.C. 699, 114 S.E. 2d 683; Goode v. Barton, 238 N.C. 492, 78 S.E. 2d 398;…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Crowell v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  5. McSwain v. McSwainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API