Ingle v. Cassady
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
The plaintiff sues to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident occurring in the State of Ohio. Liability is to be determined by the law of that State, for unless the plaintiff is entitled to recover there, he is not entitled to recover here. If, however, under the lex loci, a transitory cause of action accrues, it may be prosecuted in another jurisdiction, unless forbidden by public policy or the lex fori. This is conceded. Wise v. Hollowell, 205 N. C., 286, 171 S. E., 82; Steele v. Telegraph Co., 206 N. C., 220, 173 S. E., 583.
The defendant was not an insurer of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Wise v. . HollowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Small v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Luttrell v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Norris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Phoenix Refining Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.