Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. Jernigan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1952No. 242PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtERTiN, J.

The common law disability of the wife to sue the husband at law has been removed by statute. In consequence, a married woman has a right of action against her husband for a tort causing personal injury. King v. Gates, 231 N.C. 537, 57 S.E. 2d 765; Bogen v. Bogen, 219 N.C. 51, 12 S.E. 2d 649; Alberts v. Alberts, 217 N.C. 443, 8 S.E. 2d 523; York v. York, 212 N.C. 695, 194 S.E. 486; Roberts v. Roberts, 185 N.C. 566, 118 S.E. 9, 20 A.L.R. 1479; Crowell v. Crowell, 180 N.C. 516, 105 S.E. 206; 181 N.C. 66, 106 S.E. 149; Graves v. Howard, 159 N.C. 594, 75 S.E. 998, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 565.

This being…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Crowell v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Crowell v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Davis v. JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Wilson v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Beauchamp v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Redden v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API