Legal Opinion

Henry v. Henry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1976No. 25PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The sole question upon this appeal is: May a wife, injured in an automobile collision upon a highway in North Carolina proximately caused by the negligence of her husband, the driver of the automobile, maintain in the courts of North Carolina an action against her husband for damages on account of such injuries, the parties being domiciled at the time of the collision in the State of Pennsylvania, under the laws of which state no such action may be maintained by a wife against her husband?

In Howard v. Howard, 200 N.C. 574, 158 S.E. 101 (1931), the husband and wife were domiciled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Howard v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Shirley v. . AyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Roberts v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Shaw v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Tatham v. HokeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1979
  4. Braxton v. Anco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Resnick v. Sikorsky AircraftDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API