Legal Opinion
Akopiantz v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 1961No. Civ. 19018PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrat, P. J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate to compel the Board of Medical Examiners to issue to him without an examination a reciprocity certificate to practice as a physician and surgeon. Petitioner also purports to appeal from the order denying new trial.
Questions Presented
1. Did petitioner meet all statutory requirements?
2. Has petitioner been denied the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection of the law ?
3. Should approval of the schools attended by petitioner be ordered ?
4. Did the court err in denying a motion for new trial ?
Record
In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Allen v. Cal. Mut. Bldg & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Rosenblatt v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- In Re Investigation of the Conduct of the Examination for Admission to Practice LawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Arwine v. Board of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Savelli v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Windigo Mills v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Estate of HormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Pollak v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.