Legal Opinion

South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1964No. Civ. 21494PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

Plaintiff water district brought this action to enjoin defendants from impounding water in a dam and reservoir upon their property, thereby withholding from plaintiff water which would otherwise flow into plaintiff’s Uvas Dam. The trial court found that the water collected by defendants’ reservoir was surface drainage, or “storm” or “vagrant” waters and was not received through any watercourse. Based on this finding, judgment was entered in favor of defendants, giving them the right to impound such water on their property.

On this appeal plaintiff raises several issues, the major one being…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Fisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  5. McCown v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API