Pollak v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Emil Pollak appeals from the trial court’s denial of his supplemental petition for writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5; undesignated statutory references will be to this code) and denial of his motion for attorney’s fees (Gov. Code, § 800), arising from Poliak’s dissatisfaction with the administrative handling by the State Personnel Board (SPB) of Poliak’s challenge to discipline imposed by his employer, the State Board of Equalization (BOB).
SPB sustained four separate disciplinary charges against Pollak and ordered that he be demoted. Pollak…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATIONCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- El Dorado Irrigation District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Alameida v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Telish v. Cal. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Furtado v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.