Arwine v. Board of Med. Examiners
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION" for a Writ of Mandate to the Board of Medical Examiners of the State of California and to the members of said board. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wallace W. Wideman, and Benjamin P. Welch, for Petitioner. William C. Tait, George B. Becke, Charles S. Wheeler, and J. F. Bowie, for Bespondents.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandamus directed to the defendants requiring them to issue to the plaintiff a certificate to practice medicine and surgery in the state of California. "The application was originally made to the district court of appeal for the second district. The matter was submitted for decision to that court upon the affidavits filed by plaintiff at the institution of the proceeding and the verified answer of the defendants thereto. That court gave judgment for plaintiff, directing the issuance of the writ as prayed. In its opinion, that court found as a fact that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte GerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by19 opinions
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Savelli v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.